Орлик: Сраженья | Orlik: The battle hasn’t started yet. |
Дождемся. Время не ушло | There is still time |
Еще поправить можно зло. | Perhaps to fix this. |
Разбитый нами, нет сомненья, | Broken by us, without a doubt |
Царь не отвергнет примиренья. | The Tsar will not refuse a truce. |
Мазепа: | Mazepa: |
Нет, поздно. Русскому царю | No, it’s too late, the Russian Tsar |
Со мной мириться невозможно. | Would never be able to reconcile with me. |
Давно решилась непреложно | My fate was determined |
Моя судьба. Давно горю | Long ago. I have burned |
Стесненной злобой. Под Азовом | With hidden anger. At Azov |
Однажды я с царем суровым | Once with the stern Tsar |
Во ставке ночью пировал: | Did I feast in headquarters: |
Полны вином кипели чаши, | Our cups were brimming with wine, |
Кипели с ними речи наши. | Hot words were exchanged. |
Я слово смелое сказал. | My mouth ran away with me. |
Смутились гости молодые… | The young guests were upset… |
Царь, вспыхнув, чашу уронил | The Tsar, fired up, cast his goblet down |
И за усы мои седые | And grabbed me menacingly |
Меня с угрозой ухватил. | By my greying whiskers. |
Тогда, смирясь в бессильном гневе, | At that time, engulfed in impotent rage, |
Отмстить себе я клятву дал; | I vowed to someday get revenge; |
Носил ее — как мать во чреве | I carried this anger, like a mother in her womb |
Младенца носит. Срок настал. | Carries her infant. The time is here. |
Так, обо мне воспоминанье | Thus, he will carry this memory |
Хранить он будет до конца. | Of me until the very end. |
Петру я послан в наказанье; | I have been sent to punish Peter; |
Я терн в листах его венца: | I am the thorn in his laurel crown: |
Он дал бы грады родовые | He would give up his native cities |
И жизни лучшие часы, | And the best hours of his life, |
Чтоб снова как во дни былые | If only he could, as in olden days, |
Держать Мазепу за усы. | Grab Mazepa by his whiskers. |
Dear Readers:
Continuing my review of this piece by reporter Matvei Malgin. I already explained the essence of what Putin was trying to accomplish by gifting Tucker Carlson with copies of these archives: I think his goal was to push the point that the myth of Ukrainian statehood is just that: A myth. From the medieval point of view, I think Putin proves his point. To me personally, it doesn’t matter so much, since Ukrainian statehood did actually become a real thing after the Bolshevik Revolution. Just because something is recent, doesn’t mean that it never came into being. And Putin can rail all he wants against Lenin and the Bolsheviks, but they did have their reasons for setting things up this way. They could not have foreseen how things could go terribly wrong…
Pushkin Versus Putin
Actually, now that I think about it, if Tucker actually knew something about Russian history or literature and had been of a mind to debate Putin on the issue, he wouldn’t even need to bring the Bolsheviks into it. He could go back in time to a period just a couple of generations after Khmelnitsky. Namely to the year 1709. He could have rebutted Putin by spontaneously spouting these lines from Pushkin:
Давно замыслили мы дело;
Теперь оно кипит у нас.
Благое время нам приспело;
Борьбы великой близок час.
Без милой вольности и славы
Склоняли долго мы главы
Под покровительством Варшавы,
Под самовластием Москвы.
Но независимой державой
Украйне быть уже пора.
[Mazepa explaining the sitrep to his wife, in Pushkin’s poem Poltava]:
We’ve been plotting this thing for a long time;
And now it’s finally brewing.
It’s the right time now;
The hour of the great battle has arrived.
Not possessing any sweet freedom or glory of our own,
For a long time we were forced to bow our heads
Before the protectorate of Poland,
Or the autocratic rule of Moscow.
But the time has finally arrived
For Ukraine to be an independent state.
Evil Liakhs Came Between Us
But never mind about that, forget Tucker and his missed opportunity to devastate President Putin in a poetry slam (“Sir, you have been served!”). Forget about the traitor Mazepa, and let’s go back to the Khmelnitsky letters. The next letter is one year later (namely, 1649) than the one we discussed previously. At the time Khmelnitsky was working closely with the Russian Ambassador Grigory Unkovsky, who spent the entire spring of that year hanging out with the Cossacks in their Zaporozhian Hetmanate. According to Unkovsky, Khmelnitsky stated the following to him: “«А мы царского величества милости ищем и желаем потому, что с Владимрова святаго крещенья одна наша благочестивая вера с Московским государством и имели едину власть. А отлучили нас неправдой своей и насилием лукавые ляхи».”
(TRANSLATION: ”And we beg the mercy of the Tsar’s Greatness, and we wish this because since the time of Saint Vladimir’s christening, we have enjoyed a single faith and a single government with the Moscovite state. It was only the crafty Liakhs [=Poles] who came between us using lies and violence to separate us.”)
And the Epistles go on…
[to be continued]
”Just because something is recent, doesn’t mean that it never came into being”
The problem is not that came into being rather late, the point is that the West tries to falsify history by claiming that there was somekind of a Ukrainian Nation before it was actually brought to live after the revolution.
What I always find amusing is that the creation of Ukraine by ceding to it lands – like the Donbas, like Crimea, to create a viable entity – by those despicable Bolsheviks was ok, without even asking the populace for an agreement.
The latter decisions however to secede, to either become autonomous or joining Russia, after having been threatened and attacked by a government that that they had not elected and that had usurped power through a coup, is illegal and will not be recognized.
It is also arguable, that the conditions and understanding that existed when those donations by the then Russian leadership were made did no longer exist when Ukraine decided to leave the Union, and subsequently Ukraine lost any claim to them.
Similar to the situation in Canada (which I had pointed out before) where areas placed under the governance of Quebec would have to be returned should Quebec decide to leave the federation.
My question is: where those lands like Donbas and Crimea, the more important ones to Russia, ceded outright to Ukraine or where they just placed under the governance of the evolving entity? What kind of contracts do acually exist?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good Point!
[that political boundary] no longer exist[s] when Ukraine decided to leave/[break the contract] subsequently Ukraine lost any claim to them.
LikeLike
peter and S, I think those are solid legal points. The whole thing should have been hashed out in a court, but it was just pushed through. Quebec is a good example: Should the people there vote to secede from Canada and become a province of France, well, then, they might just have to give up some of their regions, no? I would imagine the lawyers lining up on either side, which would be far preferable to armies going at it.
As for Crimea, it was not ceded to Ukraine, it was just put under Ukrainian administration. Donbass is trickier, I think it was actually ceded to Ukraine. But I am not a lawyer, so I don’t know what I am talking about. All I know is that these things are usually decided in war, sadly.
LikeLike
good thread and commentary… yalensis – thanks for drawing attention to those papers that putin gave to carlson.. very interesting!
LikeLike
It was a fascinating period in Russian history.
LikeLike
I recall a comment about Putin by some western diplomat about him being ‘sentimental’, it’s true enough although hardly a fault.
What it tells me about most of our diplomats, they’ll know the facts, history, etc but it’s the reality now that counts.
If Putin just stated that if NATO even tried taking Sevastopol again the Pentagon would be a giant crater it might register with the likes of Biden.
LikeLike
Agree, I am all for negotiation with reasonable parties but, the radical interests that own the US political system are without reason, mercy or…grace. Given the radical ideology of the US’s rulers, the neocoloni-gilded-age-econs, there is no possible political solution…no legal argument need be applied, only a military outcome.
Now, whether that military outcome leads only to a shaky victory without prospect of a secure peace…
…or a military victory, so soundly driven into the ground that the devils whirlwinds conjured by his 3LA-minions are unable to tear the peace free of it’s foundations, that is the question?
One can only hope that the Kremlin does not lose faith in it’s commitment to a victory so solid that those seeking shelter within it’s peace may live free of the worry of war. A military victory that does not render a peace is but a truce, a pause; yes, at times better than nothing but, not by much.
LikeLike
Yes, that’s what Putin should say. Let them fear him like a mad Emperor, which is how they think of, say Kim Jong Un.
LikeLiked by 1 person
clearly it is not in putins make up to present himself this way… and maybe that is indeed a good thing.. hard to know..
LikeLike