Ukraine War Day #807: Not All Heroes Drive A Tank!

Dear Readers:

Continuing my review of this story by reporter/historian Vladimir Nagirnyak. As World War II ground to an end and the Red Army moved on Berlin, German civilians found themselves at risk for death by starvation and disease. This was the horrible end to which Hitler had guided them.

The task of storming Berlin was assigned to the First Belorussian Front. In all, only 22 days were allocated to planning this major operation! By comparison, the Vistula-Oder Offensive took 66 days to plan; and Operation Bagration 88 days. Commander of the Berlin operation was Marshal Georgy Zhukov.

Zhukov

Given the short planning time, Zhukov was worried that the logistics were not properly in place to support such a massive operation. To be able to summon up the supplies required “needed truly heroic efforts on the part of the workers of the rear,” Zhukov recalled. Fortunately, these workers were up to the task, they acquitted themselves of every assignment they were given, no matter how impossible it might have seemed. In this very short period of time, the Soviet “rear workers” (тыловики – “tyloviki”) performed a massive amount of work. As a result of their heroic labor, three regular armies, two tank armies, and a huge number of reinforcements were able to take the capital of Nazi Germany without wanting for a single thing that they needed. Behind every bullet, behind every shell fired by the Red Army men in the streets of Berlin, there stood the modest unheralded deeds of the rear units. And not only that – these tyloviki had the means and experience needed to save the peaceful civilians of the German capital.

Roads And Bridges

The tyloviki had received and unloaded more than a thousand train cars packed with military supplies. As the storming of the city began, 3,000 trucks uninterruptedly delivered supplies to, and evacuated the wounded from, the front line. The railroad workers units played an equally important role. They were able to repair the damaged rail linking Küstrin with Berlin; and this repair enabled supplies to be delivered directly to the Lichtenberg Station in Berlin.

The Berlin-Lichtenberg Railroad Station, as it looks today.

During the course of the Berlin operation, the railroad workers restored 623 km of railroad tracks, which is the approximate distance between Moscow and Leningrad.

The Oder River formed the last stand of the Nazi army. Here the Wehrmacht stood its ground and destroyed bridge after bridge, as they were being built by the Soviet troops. Some bridges were destroyed and rebuilt up to 12 times! Nonetheless, the Soviets kept building bridges, and were able to move two tank armies across the Oder. Something like 1.6 million cars, and over 48,000 tanks and artillery carts were moved over the river during the storming of Berlin.

Meanwhile, the road builders also had to cope with extremely complicated tasks. Their work assisted the movement of Soviet troops within Berlin itself. On May 2, when Berlin was taken, Soviet military photo-reporter Evgeny Khaldei snapped his most famous photograph at the Brandenburg Gates. This iconic photo was called “Traffic Policewoman of the Victory”. It gave the promise of normal life returning, at some point in the future. A peaceful future in which directing traffic at a busy intersection was the utmost task to solve.

Khaldei’s iconic photograph

Even while this woman, and others, started directing traffic, clashes were still occurring within the city. The road builders/repairers followed close behind the storming units. After a block was cleared of any remaining Nazis, the road workers left behind traffic police to keep order at the intersections. Occasionally a repaired road might be damaged again, as pieces of a building collapsed onto it; and then the road workers had to go back in and fix it again.

The Spectre Of Famine

As the Red Army closed in on the German heartland, Nazi propagandists terrified the population with stories of Russian cruelty and acts of vengeance. “The Russian barbarians will not spare anyone,” the people were told. Hitler himself had used starvation as a weapon against the Russians (extermination of the Russian population was official policy and even put in writing); and so the German people expected similar payback.

Fortunately for the Germans, the Soviet leadership had some better standards. The Soviet government issued precise guidelines for the behavior their troops must adhere to, upon entering enemy soil. Even back in 1942 Stalin had declared that the USSR was only out for the annihilation of the Hitler clique, and not the German people per se. Stalin: “Our experience of history shows us that Hitlers come and go, but the German people, and the German state, always remain.”

During the Vistula-Oder Offensive, Soviet troops had encountered terrified and impoverished German refugees on the roads. Soviet commanders ordered their troops to provide food and clothing to women, old men, children, and invalids. But this was just the beginning. Soviet tyloviki soon found themselves tasked with saving the entire population of Berlin from famine; and we are talking about over 2.7 million people!

General Nikolai Zhizhin

You see, 2-3 months prior to the fall of Berlin, the Germans had stopped being able to bring food supplies into their capital. Two weeks before the fall, there was no bread. When the Red Army took the capital, they found a city whose logistics and supply system were completely stalled. All those Nazis who were supposed to be responsible for supplying the capital had fled; as had the owners of food establishments. It seemed that the inhabitants of the city were doomed to death by starvation.

This was the situation facing the victorious Commanders of the First Belorussian Front. From their very first days in Berlin they had to take on the task of saving the civilians from starvation. General Nikolai Zhizhin, who commanded the tyloviki, was put in charge of solving this problem. Over 300 officers from the reserve were put at his disposal. They requisitioned 820 trucks and set about supplying the city. One of the very first things they did was to load up the trucks with 1700 tons of potatoes from certain regions of Germany East of the Oder. These humble spuds may have saved the lives of many Berliners.

Zhizhin’s operational team worked out a rationing system for different categories of the population. A large group (around 1.5 million people) consisted of dependents (иждивенцы) and children under the age of 10. In some cases, the Soviet rations were even more generous than those of the Hitler regime. For example, the Hitler regime only provided “surrogate coffee”, whereas the Soviets provided real (natural) coffee as well as tea. At a certain point, the Hitler regime of rationing had started to replace the meat ration with cheese or cottage cheese. Whereas, under the Soviet rationing system, each German began to receive 60 grams of fresh meat per day.

Soviet soldiers ladle out soup for starving Germans.

Later it was decided to create a produce storage center in Berlin. To help set this up, People’s Commissar for External Trade, Anastas Mikoyan, made the trip from Moscow to Germany, accompanied by General Andrei Khrulev, a Logistics Commander of the rear. Under their leadership, tyloviki from three fronts, in May-June alone (1945) were able to bring into Berlin: 78,000 tons of grain, 18,500 tons of flour, 13,700 tons of meat, 114,000 tons of potatoes.

Soviet efforts in saving Berliners from hunger and epidemics were appreciated at the time, even if forgotten nowadays. Never before had the Red Army conducted military operations in a massive city the size of Berlin. And this was also a unique experience for the tyloviki. In fact, their accomplishments violated existing norms, because they were technically never supposed to be so close to the action as to be almost intermingled with the front-line troops. And yet they did what they had to do, and by so doing saved the ordinary people of Berlin from certain starvation.

This entry was posted in Friendship of Peoples, Human Dignity, Military and War, Russian History and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Ukraine War Day #807: Not All Heroes Drive A Tank!

  1. Gerald says:

    ‘they also serve who only stand and wait’ … or who work in the rear.

    Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      To me, logistics and supplies sounds like a very tough job! Especially back in those days, before they had computers.

      Liked by 1 person

      • JC says:

        It’s still a tough job. Not the least because even with computers to tell you where what is supposed to go, they are only as good as the information put in, which means only as good as the information gathered AND then transmitted.

        It’s a massive game of telephone in two directions (one of which is the traditional delicate order of what, where, when), which as we all know leads to hilarious results in the schoolroom… but not so hilarious in real life.

        And yet, it is logistics that wins wars. Or even battles. The USA used to be quite good at it, but let all the mechanisms go to rot along with everything else “real” in the country.

        Like

        • yalensis says:

          Well, American logistics must be the hardest of all, because they have to fly and ship stuff all over the world, to places thousands of miles away. Maintaining a far-flung empire is hard work. Poor things!

          Like

  2. Beluga says:

    OK, I stand corrected on the food supply by Russia to Germany and specifically Berlin in 1945. Hard to argue with this avalanche of new facts. I accept them.

    A soliloquy. When I was less than three, I achieved the ability to retain memory. I awoke in a British-occupied town outside Hamburg at the age of two years, 10 months. My mother was pregnant and deiivered my first brother four months later. My father was a squadron leader in the Royal Air Force at the nearby Bookeburg base, a doctor. I recollect my mother unable to eat strawberries in hospital where she had gone, five months pregnant, to have her wisdom teeth removed. Dad had not chosen wisely due to her sore gums, and him a doctor at that. I ate them — they were in cream in a bowl on the nightstand. Four months later, Dad asked me to pick out my new brother through the glass of the newborn ward where maybe a dozen babies lay in tiny cots. I picked my brother last as he was the ugliest, a matter of family delight for years afterwards. He of course turned out blond, blue-eyed and handsome!

    Anyway, as I grew older, I heard stories of near famine and no heat in Britain due to no coal supplies, 1945 to 47. Look it up. People combing rail tracks for loose lumps of coal. The place was truly bust. Dad graduated as a doc and joined the RAF in ’46. Mum and I joined him in late ’49 over in Germany. In the years following, I learned that the Germans in the British-occupied sector were scornful of the Brits because of terrible food and zero consumer goods. They wanted to be in the American sector. Boy, was Britain bust! We had ration cards until 1954. We had two German maids in our RAF-confiscated apartment as befitted Dad’s “status”. They let us know they got better food from their own farmers than was issued to our family (and German citizens at large) from Blighty that one of them cooked for us. Frozen mutton from Australia, years old, was a staple. The younger maid, Gisela, one day took me to her father’s farm, including a train journey, where I tasted real fresh ham for the first time. The wonder of it was that my parents allowed me to travel with her unescorted – she was about 17. And I have photos of the apartment place, the people and me. Must have a look at them — Dad died 35 years ago and never brought them out for a look anyway.

    Dad was always saying that the Germans got right on with rebuilding the Hamburg area even before we were there, they had pride. Whereas in England I played in old bombsites in 1957 in Portsmouth. Everyone in the UK sat on their hands figuring the government owed them a living. Dad was critical of Blighty — we emigrated in ’59 when a car assembly line worker made 50% more than a psychiatrist like him. He’d had enough, couldn’t make ends meet, had to sponge off his mother. An Oxford graduate, too. Thankyou, NHS. More than tripled his income moving to Canada, and he got a salaried job paying about half of what a local rural Canadian regular doc billed in a year. But to him, he was rich.

    So, my guess is that the road rebuilding in Berlin wasn’t Russian troops, but Germans directed by Russians. The Germans wanted to get on with it. The Brits were exhausted, physically and financially for years, dispirited really. And owed the US a lot of Lend-Lease money. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I heard that Stalin told the US to take a hike when it came to paying the US bill for equipment supplied. He thought it ridiculous to pay for materiel used to fight a common enemy, and I agree with that. It’s like these Ukrainian weapons supposedly supplied on loan by the US. Always money with them. But Britain was unable to escape paying the US back, hence its abject poverty for over 15 years, and handing over Persian oil interests, military bases, quitting India and so on. Now it’s a good little doggie for the US, always looking for table scraps and yipping excitedly in agreement whenever a US neocon makes a stupid comment.

    So, thanks for this, yalensis. Updates my worldview. It seems for the most part, the Russians were the good guys in Germany immediately at the end of WW2. Then the Americans began to outspend them there in West Germany, and allowed a good standard of living at home too. All came crashing to a halt by the early ’70s as West Germany stood on its own two feet, and the elites could scale back largesse at home. East Germany, which was a hellhole, what little I saw of it in 1980, and the Eastern European nations were, like Russia / Soviet Umion, not as rich as America, and could not compete in granting citizens affluent consumer lifestyles. It’s like Russians in Lithuania today comparing their standard of living with the Russian area adjacent to it — they’re better off in Lithuania for the moment, at least.

    Ah, I’m tired of this crappy world we live in, principally caused by the US rich. Things are going downhill rapidly in economic terms here in my part of Canada. Housing / rent costs doubling, food prices through the roof. In three years, minimum wage gone from $13 to a whole $15 an hour, and companies squawk mightily at the extravagance of even that. Every newscast and opinion piece these days goes on about the unbearable cost of living for the majority, while the rich grin from ear-to-ear.

    Stick a fork in it. Hmm. It’s nearly done.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Thick Red Duke says:

      Great story. Thanks.

      Like

    • S Brennan says:

      “…Britain was unable to escape paying the US back, hence…handing over Persian oil interests, military bases, quitting India and so on…”

      Oh cry me a river why don’t you…England stole the above mentioned assets…sheesh. The reason the US leadership is so bereft of talent right now is that it’s overwhelmingly ruled by the acolytes of upper-class-England. That’s what “prep-schools” in the US are, indoctrination centers for those that aspire to be or serve the upper most class. “Prep-schools” are hell bent on creating an analog of the pre-WW I English class system. The world has never seen a propaganda machine like that of England’s.

      Neither Marshal, nor Eisenhower wanted a return of colonial rule. That’s because they knew…

      WW-I did not occur in a vacuum it occurred because Britain interfered with the legitimate interests of eastern Europe. England’s loss of empire was a self-inflicted gunshot. Indeed, the US decline, [for the vast majority of it’s population], is a direct result of the US foregoing mercantilism for the English ideology of financialization..what-ever-the-eff-you want to call it. And that is..a direct result of the above mentioned acolytes of upper-class-England.

      Speaking of dogs, the English have done a fine job of wagging this US dog. Until the English-inspired neocoloni-econs grabbed power in the late 1970’s the US did a pretty good job at wealth distribution and Canada and the US were truly brother nations.

      The anglo-propaganda machine over the last 40 years has convinced the population of the world that FDRism 1932-1978 never existed but, it did. It might of been mortally wounded in November of 1963 but, it lingered on just over a decade.

      Liked by 2 people

      • yalensis says:

        Well, I think the English, after they lost their empire, should have just bucked themselves up and tried to change themselves for the better. And, with hard work and a “can-do” attitude, they might have been able to achieve something good that didn’t involve squashing other people.

        Instead, they started reading Murdoch tabloids and lowered their collective IQ by at least 50 points in the process. If people want to remain smart and keyed into the world, then they need to fill their minds with good literature, music, and art. Not trashy tabloids.

        Like

        • S Brennan says:

          Murdoch & Robert Maxwell [Ghislaine Maxwell’s father] were MI-6 assets. Murdoch took over most of the US’s newsgroups with the 3LA’s blessing and financial aid [see Jeff Bezos/WaPo/CIA for a modern analog].

          After that, the news was no longer the news. The Anglo-World-Media is the 3LAs of DC/London/Jerusalem’s mouthpiece. Just ask anybody who grew up under the Stasi’s media control about the Anglo-World-Media and they’ll just give you a knowing smile.

          What people see today bears no resemblance to the US during the FDRist era [circa 1932-1978]. This distorted view, [assisted by time and media lies], leads to wrong assumptions and remedies that will not cure. Of course, there are parties in the US/Britain/Aus/Canada who are delighted to go along with the 3LA’s media fraud and rewrite of history. These peoples motives may vary somewhat but, they are united in retelling history to suit their ideology…with the unifying theme being the erasure of truth.

          Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      Thanks for that story and interesting memories, Beluga. It’s amazing that you started remembering at such a tender age. I don’t remember a thing that happened to me before the age of 5, and actually not a lot after that either!

      It’s very sad what you write about England and its pathetic fall. Its appalling colonialism notwithstanding, England was still a great country, and it’s sad to see how much it declined. There are ways for a country to age and decline gracefully, they still have their history and culture, great literature, etc., to offer the world; if only they would wake up and get out from under the American boot.

      Like

    • ccdrakesannetnejp says:

      Thanks for the story. I don’t know about what Stalin said, but officially, at least, both the UK and Russia paid off their war debts to the US in, I believe, 2005. Is it just chance that in 2006 Putin began to assert Russia’s independence from the US and Nato? The US decided to try to bankrupt Britain during WWI and right after. Lend-lease was just an extension of the financial war against the UK and USSR/RF. During WW2 my grandfather was in charge of making destroyer escorts at the Boston Navy Yard that were sent right off to Britain. He told me it was common knowledge that, although the destroyer escorts/frigates did have utility against U-boats, the main purpose of lend-lease was to help completely bankrupt Britain, to force it to give up its colonies, to make it kiss the ring of the US, and to help the US, along with former German intel officers shipped to the US under Operation Paperclip, turn itself into the American Empire. The Marshall Plan had the same ultimate purpose: US economic hegemony in Europe. I’m sure the US wanted to do the same to the USSR, but luckily the USSR’s economy and the Red army/technology prevented a similar outcome.

      Like

      • yalensis says:

        Yes, it is clear that the United States decided to bankrupt and demote Great Britain, a former ally.

        Doesn’t seem like that was a very nice thing to do. But I blame the Brits even more for being masochistic. If you see somebody bound on harming you, then you need to call them out on it! Even if you can’t stop them, at least hold your head up high instead of bending the knee!

        Like

        • S Brennan says:

          C’mon folks,

          Lend-lease was not a popular program in the US prior to the war, it was passed by FDR over much opposition, the terms were not monetary it was supposed to be repaid in kind, not by money. Although Britain, China and Russia were it’s main recipients over forty countries got aid through the program.

          The amount of tonnage sunk prior to Britain and Russia taking receipt of said goods and thereby not being subject to repayment exceeded that which was sent. FYI, the Merchant Marine had one of the highest casualty rates of the services. German/Japanese subs sunk over 700 US Merchant Marine vessels carrying war supplies to Britain China and the USSR. Neither Britain nor the USSR paid one cent for those sunken vessels or their cargo…such a deal!

          If that is what the Anglophiles of today call “thievery” it is the most ass-backwards form of the crime in recorded in history.

          Of the over 30 billion borrowed by Britain,
          some 8 Billion alone was paid for by billeting American Servicemen stationed in Australia and Britain who were defending the aforementioned countries from Axis aggression…talk about ingratitude!

          Churchill in describing Roosevelt’s motives said:

          “At about that same time he devised the extraordinary measure of assistance called Lend-Lease, which will stand forth as the most unselfish and unsordid financial act of any country in all history”.

          Factoid: It was Truman who ended lend-lease abruptly for England; his advisers were not those who were any part of the original deal. So the maniacal machination presented above are, at best, not supported by established time lines.

          “Seventy five years ago, an agreement was signed in Washington for a US loan to the UK government of $3.75 billion repayable over 50 years. The UK’s final payments on this, and a loan from Canada agreed in March 1946, would not be made until December 2006….

          Though the terms of the US loan were generous by the standards of the time [many elite] favored refusal, confident the US would be forced capitulate if the UK simply walked away from the loan it had all but demanded only seven years before”

          As for the Soviet Union:

          “Formal negotiations between the U.S. and USSR to settle the Lend-Lease account began in 1947. The two countries could not agree, the United States dropped its claim from $1.3 billion to $800 million and the Soviet Union upped its offer from $170 million to $240 million. Negotiations were suspended in late 1951”

          …and did not resume until 1971, the debt was settled in 1972 for $725 million with the final installment was paid over thirty five years later.

          The US today has many faults, which, I often outline here but, the enormous ingratitude shown by some of the posting Anglophiles here is hard to reckon with when compared to historical data or precedent.

          The English empire collapsed because, like so many before it and the American Empire currently, it was overextended. Stop with the pathetic excuses, you sound like a Monty Python sketch of “Upper Class Twit of the Year”.

          Like

  3. Thick Red Duke says:

    My grandpa (navy officer) spent the WW2 years in house arrest. My grandma was still in charge of some of the civilian parts of the naval base. Every day she would collect leftover food, go to the German side of the base and throw packages of food over the fence to the Russian POWs. Sometimes the German soldiers would check, but most often they just turned away pretending not to see. The POWs probably worked more if they got something to eat. But it must be said that the individual German soldiers generally behaved well towards the local population. If they didn’t they knew they would end up on the Eastern front.

    When the peace came, it was my aunt’s turn to stay at home. At least in the evening. Because outside roamed America’s “greatest generation”, i.e. a bunch of thugs and rapists, not a place for a young lady to be after dark. I can assure you my family’s conception of the average American wasn’t great.

    It was the same in France. The Germans adviced Patton to behave well against the French. Of course he didn’t listen.

    The current love affair between Europe and the US seems to be of a fairly new date. Everything changed when Ronald Reagan single-handedly crushed communism and tore down the Berlin wall with his bare hands /sarc. I believe most people born in the 1960s up to those who are teenagers today, a span of about 50 years, will always admire or even love the US. They only know the good part of American culture. But with the current direction of the US I expect things to change almost as fast as they did in the 80s. For Europe Eurasia is the future, not the US in its present state.

    Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      Thanks for that fascinating story, Red Duke! It’s amazing how much time has passed, and yet World War II is still “THE” war. It still affects all of us, in every way, no matter where we are from. My family had some amazing stories as well, on both sides of the family. And there were a lot of family secrets as well, things that only came out eventually, things that people didn’t want to talk about because it was too painful. One side of my family almost went extinct, but due to a one-in-a-thousand miracle I am here!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. countrumford says:

    Tyloviki is a great word, it roles offf the tongue even if I am mispronouncing it. Great comments from all. CR

    Like

    • yalensis says:

      Be sure to pronounce it with the stress on the fourth and final syllable:

      тыловики́

      Phonetically something like [till-a-vik-EE]

      dee-dee-dee-DA

      Like

  5. Pavlo Svolochenko says:

    Some form of offensive is underway in the Kharkov region – Ukrainians elsewhere describe it as diversionary to the main assault in Chasov Yar.

    They also anticipate imminent action in the Sumy region. Nervous grunting at the possibility of Russian forces opening new fronts has been a feature of Ukrainian discourse for at least the past six months, but given developments in Kharkov it is possible something may come of it this time.

    Like

  6. Westernaganda is carrying on the naziganda job. “Putin’s hordes will kill you all!” they say, while Russia rescues and rebuilds.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment