Ukraine War Day #792: French Odessa Is Macron’s Phantom Limb – Part I

Dear Readers:

This historical piece by reporter Matvei Malgin helps to explain France’s obsession with defeating Russia in Crimea. Yes, I said France, not England. Although the English are obsessed as well. Neither former colonialist power seems to be able to just let it go and mind their own business.

This seems to happen every time a colonial power is kicked out of a place by people whom they consider, if not necessarily subhuman, at least folks not deserving of any subjectivity or agency of their own; inferior people whose destiny is to obey the superior nation; inferior people like Africans… or Russians… The colonizer, once kicked out, experiences a sort of “phantom limb” sensation, as if the former colony were one of its limbs, now cut off forever. And sometimes they simply cannot accept the fact that the limb is gone!

Case in point: France ruled the city of Odessa for 100 days. They lost it, they can’t just let it go, and now they want it back!

Malgin: 105 years ago, in late April of 1919, a rebellion broke out among French sailors quartered in Sebastopol. Many historians believe that this rebellion put an end to France’s decision to cease its intervention against Soviet Russia, and to finally withdraw from Crimea.

Modern-day France is moving in the opposite direction, hinting that they would like to send their troops to Odessa. As if, by doing so, they could somehow avenge their century-old humiliation and reinstate themselves as a power to be reckoned with on the Black Sea.

The Intervention

In 1918, Britain and France, acting together as allies, decided to occupy Russia, dividing up their spheres of responsibility.

French propaganda (1919) claimed that Bolsheviks would steal children from the villages, in order to indoctrinate them in Communist ideology.

The French would manage Bessarabia, Crimea, and the Northeastern sector of the Black Sea. The main goal was to prevent the Germans from seizing the shoreline and its ports. Allied troops had already been dispatched, but before they even landed, the war ended with a peace treaty; and with it, the raison d’être for this operation.

In November 1918 the French troops disembarked in Novorossijsk initially, then in Sebastopol and Odessa. By the start of 1919 the interventionists had succeeded in subduing Kherson and Nikolaev.

The French, like all good colonizers, sought support among the local population. While this was going on, the Bolsheviks were busy concluding a separate peace with Germany. The French cooperated with the Whites, and also actively supported Simon Petliura in Ukraine. Not having a clue how to work through all the complexities and sort out all the different players, they found themselves entangled in the Russian Civil War.

The one thing the French were clear about, is that they wanted to colonize Russia, their recent ally in the Entente. To further this goal, they quickly took under their control local resources and the transportation network. What the French did not understand, was that the end of WWI also put an end to the traditional era of European colonization of other countries. It didn’t put an end to colonialism per se, just to the standard model wherein the colonizing nation exerted direct control over the resources and infrastructure of the colonized nation.

This was not yet understood. (The new era of neo-colonialism, wherein things were done more delicately, was only just dawning.)

As historical documents have illuminated, the French government demanded of its troops in the South of Russia, that they obtain the transfer “of the right to exploit all the railroads of Russia, and all of the tariffs and fees for all the ports of the Black and Azov Seas; that all excess grain from the Ukrainian and Kuban Provinces be shipped to France; all the oil fields and production of benzine should be placed under French control and exploitation; and all the coal that is mined in the Donetsk region.”

The leaders of the White movement understood quite well these goals of their “allies”, but they were not able to accomplish any of these tasks for their new masters.

Next: The Bolsheviks organize a rebellion.

[to be continued]

This entry was posted in Cat Fighting, Military and War, Russian History and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Ukraine War Day #792: French Odessa Is Macron’s Phantom Limb – Part I

  1. james says:

    hi yalensis!

    speaking of 1919 french propaganda, how about some 2024 british propaganda on the same topic??

    https://johnhelmer.net/a-nasty-little-book-about-the-allied-invasion-of-russia-in-1918-is-a-nasty-big-lesson-for-now/

    Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      Ooh, thanks James! This is a great article by Helmer.

      Racism against Russians is pervasive throughout the book; it’s what Reid shares with Churchill and all the others. “Generally speaking,” Reid quotes from an American army manual, “the Russian is exactly like a child – inquisitive, easily gulled, easily offended…” 

      So true… Well, with traits like that, we can’t possibly compete against the sophisticated Englishmen. What with their seaside holiday packages and Campbell’s cream of mushroom soup and Watney’s Red Barrel…

      Like

  2. S Brennan says:

    This war against Russia, initiated by DC/London, a war whose aim is to partition Russia into small states that can be subjected to neocolonialist rule and resource extraction has, through insatiable greed, added many other capitals in Europe. Time is a factor in war and this neocolonial war against Russia/[the Russian peoples] has, in the fullness of time, become a World War in all but name…

    The Russian tactic/strategy[?] of going very slowly, very predictably has had [and will have] the effect of expanding the war…not containing it. This is a tragedy that rivals what Sophocles put forth, in that, the most honorable of intentions are leading to a tragic result and we, an unwilling audience, must watch the story unfold.

    Like

  3. Beluga says:

    Fascinating. I look forward to Part Deux, where presumably some French arses will be hammered and kicked.

    I believe the Odessa link to be tenuous with regard to Micron. Doubt he knows this history any more than I do. His is just a racist outlook pure and simple, I believe. The Russians, on the other hand, venerate their history, so it’s they who will bring up France’s 100 day overlordship of Odessa then getting the boot.

    Micron believes the white man rules. Especially that certain race of nitwits who inhabit the region once known as Gaul. I’m quite sure he regards the true Frenchman as superior to other humans, and even above the race of the Rothschilds, his present and past employer. In Micron’s fantasy, battle-hardened Frog Foreign Legionnaires plucked from policing the undermenschen of the Sahel (they were of course kicked out over the past 9 months, and the US is being similarly treated, but Micron loftily and conveniently disregards that **) will enter Ukraine, and club those stupid slavic Russians to surrender in but a few days. I honestly believe he feels that way, delusional as it is. Plus, after having its tail shorn in Saharan Africa, Frahnce needs to pick itself up and swagger around a bit, because, ma foi, ze Anglais and der Boche are at heart nonentities compared to the glorious Gaulois. Cue the Marseillaise, when true Frenchmen pluck their berets from their tetes and weep silently pour la gloire.

    ** Today, Garland Nixon lets Scott Ritter opine on four topics for an hour. Ritter knows more than all the other pundits put together, IMO. His 15 minutes on the Sahel topic, the Africa Corps (Wagner), the kicking out of Frogs and Yankees, and the new Chinese oil pipeline from Niger to Benin is eye-opening. Poor old Micron. Nobuddy loves him at the moe-mon. C’est tragique.

    Like

  4. hismastersvoice says:

    That propaganda postcard is certainly a lot less spectacular than the postcards on sale on the streets of Paris at the same time . . . which may explain its failure to impress anyone.

    It also rather resembles the opening of Monty Python and the Holy Grail, as in:

    “Bring out your dead!”

    “But I’m not dead yet! In fact, I’m feeling much — ”

    (THUMP)

    “OK, here’s yer thru’pence”

    I don’t want to pre-empt your arguments, however, but I don’t believe that the current French project is about colonialism. The US agribusiness lobby has Ukraine pretty much sewn up on that score.

    Like

Leave a comment