Ukraine War Day #761: “ISIS dunnit” Propagandist Unmasked

Dear Readers:

I saw this interesting opinion piece by a Russian political analyst named Gleb Kuznetsov. Gleb was reading various Western sources lobbying in favor of the “ISIS trace” theory in the Crocus Terror Attack. It goes without saying that Westie propaganda has settled on the “ISIS dunnit” theory, they established this narrative probably even before the terror attack actually occurred. As a theory, it is ridiculous and cynical, but probably good enough to satisfy the average American housewife who actually reads Westie press as her news source.

Political pundit Gleb Kuznetsov

But something in one of the sources caught Gleb’s eye, the name Soufan Group. “This vaguely stirred something hidden in the recesses of my memory. So, I googled it, and sure enough, the Soufan Group was founded by a man named Ali Soufan. Again, a fleeting memory from the beginning of the 2000’s. This guy was famous during that period after 911 when Muslims were persecuted in the U.S.”

According to Gleb, the American FBI, after the Twin Towers terror attack, organized a group of provocateurs whose goal was to entrap and arrest American Muslims. They would approach people in mosques, universities, bookstores, and the like, and engage them in conversation. What do they think about government policy? About the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq? Do they feel any sympathy for those victims among the civilian populations of those countries? Are they horrified by what is going on at Guantanamo?

Often enough, the interlocutors would say too much and talk their way into a goodly prison sentence, in line with the new American “anti-terrorism” laws.

Ali Soufan in Afghanistan, 2001

Now comes the interesting part: One of the main curators of this project was Ali Soufan. An ethnic Arab, one of only 10 Arabic-speaking officers of the FBI. A very famous case during his tenure was that of Rafiq Sabir, a Florida doctor, who was (in 2005) sentenced to 25 years in jail, after being tricked (by Soufan) to repeat a verbal oath that he would provide medical assistance to Iraqi soldiers, if asked. Soufan posed as a high-level officer of Al-Qaida and threatened Sabir into repeating the oath. The entrapment worked, and Sabir was arrested.

Later, Soufan wrote a couple of books about the so-called “War on Terror”, advertising his own huge contribution to it. Which included a stint in Guantanamo, torturing inmates. Gleb had read some of these books, this is what sparked something in his memory.

Thanks to these books, Soufan became popular within certain circles in the U.S. An Arab himself, provoking other Arabs and helping to torture them in Guantanamo, what an unusual gem! His fame and popularity allowed him to establish a successful NGO which dealt with, naturally, “problems of security and international relations.”

Soufan’s big payday arrived on March 23, 2024, when specialists from the “Soufan Group” distinguished themselves as the first of the “independent experts” who pointed the finger at ISIS as the alleged perpetrators of the Crocus massacre in Moscow. ISIS being an organization which, in turn, has distinguished itself in recent years with terrorist attacks against “the enemies of Islam.” Who always happen to be the very same enemies: the Taliban, Iran and Russia. No other enemies of Islam. Just those three. What a coincidence that these entities also happen to be on the American hitlist!

This entry was posted in Military and War, True Crime and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to Ukraine War Day #761: “ISIS dunnit” Propagandist Unmasked

  1. michaeldroy says:

    Well spotted. It was the maximum of provocation against Russia with a minimum level of denial.
    Of course the real US problem is that no one is writing fake Bucha stories (note the BBC have Never reported directly on or from Bucha, just reported on Kiev claims).
    People don’t hate Russia enough so the best thing is to make Russia bomb the living daylights out of Kiev (which is precisely what will now be reported).

    Like

  2. Beluga says:

    Well, interesting post after all I feared. Another psychopath out for glory.

    Breaking news: Zircon hypersonic missiles hit military decision making centre in Kiev. Wonder who kicked the bucket …

    Slightly older overnight news: “Admiral Rob Bauer, who holds a high position in the alliance and previously stated NATO’s readiness for confrontation with Russia, announced his abandonment of intentions to send troops to the special operation zone. In his address, he called on the alliance member countries not to forget about their responsibility to other NATO members.” D’you think even the Americans realize that now is not the greatest time to provoke the RF with shit talk?

    Russian missiles have beaten total ratshit out of Ukraine including all airfields these past two days. Admiral Bauer may have noticed. Of course, Ukie dummkopfs are still sending drones out — about all they’ve got left. That and shells to kill civilians. Some EW downed drones have taunts about Crocus written on them. Maybe those Zircons had Krylo Budanov’s office/home address in their targeting systems — one can but hope. We shall see.

    The US seems a bit concerned that Ukie attacks on RF oil refineries is affecting world oil prices. But as with Israeli religious nutbars, the US doesn’t control the Ukies any more, nor the activities of the CIA versus State versus DoD, nor the sly tea drinkers from MI6. If Manly Macron sticks his neck up above the parapet in the next few days and bleats, the Eiffel Tower will need serious repair by les hommes in hazmat suits chewing iodine pills pour la gloire de France.

    The RF is in serious snit mood. And who can blame them?

    Liked by 2 people

    • yalensis says:

      That’s interesting about Admiral Bauer. I have seen several signs and portents that the U.S. is about to drop their Ukraine project like an overly-roasted potato. That might be one reason why official spokespersons are “making nice”, or at least shedding some crocodile tears about Crocus, instead of openly gloating. I think Blinken even tried to toss Putin a bone when he admitted (was that Blinken?) that Russia had been fighting against ISIS in Syria! Any bourgeois American housewife reading that would be going, “Wait! I thought WE were the ones fighting against ISIS, and Russia was helping the terrorists? Now I’m confused!”

      Liked by 1 person

    • JC says:

      Last time Russia had large gatherings shot up in Moscow, they leveled Grozny and killed all the CIA/MI6 assets so far back up the chain the region to this date has been delighted to demonstrate loyalty by sending testosterone-laden men to shoot fascists all day every day.

      I hope part of the conversation in Washington is a little realpolitik moment regarding just who gets caught messing with the bear’s cubs–and maybe, just maybe, that explains why Nuland exited. She very well may have crossed some internal lines.

      Like

      • yalensis says:

        That actually seems likely. (The theory about Nuland crossing some internal lines, although one had started to believe that this coven of vampires don’t actually have any lines.) 

        I read somewhere that Noodles tried to write off her exit as the “Boys Club” placing a glass ceiling above her, this would implicate Blinken as the male chauvinist pig in the room – LOL!

        Like

  3. peter moritz says:

    Of course it must have been ISIS, the boogeyman (created of course with the help of the Saudis and their bosom buddies in the CIA et.al.) for all purposes. After all, they enjoy still today the hospitality of US protective forces in Syria.

    The diguise is wearing threadbare rather fast, I just wonder how come their pay was rather low. Or maybe it was so low because the agency(ies) hiring them knew any more would be wasted, as they needed to be caught to make the cover story stick. I bet those guys have no clue who actually hired them.

    As Mercouris pointed out yesterday, the get away was astonishingIy badly planned and executed, when compared to the meticulously planned and executed attack.

    Like

    • yalensis says:

      The shivery-blubbery guy in the video (I forget which one is Dumb and which one is Dumber) even told the cop that he had ditched his debit card during their hasty getaway. WHAT??!!! You shot all those people for money, and then threw away the money?

      Like

  4. ISIS is a nonexistent organisation with fake “caliphs” and its raison d’etre is to recruit gullible young Sunnis to act as cannon fodder to help the cause of the American Empire and its zionist colonial master.

    Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      Raghead, if you weren’t my friend, I would go, “No shit, Captain Obvious!”

      Excuse my sarcasm, but of course you are right. This is why I inserted the pic of Archer. Archer is my secret code/dog whistle for “Who created ISIS and why they named it ISIS!” I think only my readers get the joke though…

      Like

      • S Brennan says:

        C’mon Y, you’re stepping on one my tag lines “not to be Captain Obvious but…”

        Like

        • yalensis says:

          You don’t own Captain Obvious. He belongs to all the people.

          Like

          • S Brennan says:

            Oh no…not that “communal ownership” business…AGAIN ???

            BTW Y, I saw an excellent vid that discussed, Putin’s dislike of Lenin and how Putin felt that Lenin built a social foundation that was sure to fail [and did]. Very interesting contrast to your POV.

            Like

            • yalensis says:

              Putin = Le Bourgeois gentilhomme

              Liked by 1 person

              • S Brennan says:

                Not quite true Y,

                Putin’s thinking relates to Lenin setting up a single party/power structure inted of a set of laws.

                Like

              • yalensis says:

                Well, the single-party thing was not the original plan. It arose out of emergencies in the Civil War; the war situation gave rise to a dictatorship. Then Stalin came along with made the single-party system permanent.

                Putin should talk, he is basically running a one-party system himself!

                Liked by 1 person

              • S Brennan says:

                Well, the vid documented it was Lenin NOT Stalin !

                And last I checked the Communist party drags the bottom with only 6-13% in every election…not Putin’s doing?

                Like

  5. TomA says:

    An important understanding.

    Hundreds of thousands of average Ivans are now dead in Ukraine (and millions wounded) because of the actions of a relatively few psychopaths running the government in Kiev (and also their foreign masters in the US/EU and NATO). The same is true for slaughter of innocents in Moscow. The real culprits in sponsoring and implementing this horror are relatively few in number. The persons responsible for these atrocities should have skin in the game too, and not just their dupes fighting at the zero line.

    Like

  6. Ben says:

    Seems like you’re really misrepresenting Soufan’s career here.

    Like

      • Ben says:

        Being able to speak Arabic, the guy was in an extreme minority, underfunded and largely ignored. He very likely could have stopped the 9/11 attacks but the CIA refused to hand over key intelligence.

        After 9/11 he spearheaded a program that tried to hone in on suspicious individuals. You’re presenting it as if he just went after randos, but Rafiq Sabir and his friend Tarik Shah were under suspicion. I’d call it semi-entrapment; Soufan baited Sabir, claiming he was a member of al-Qaeda and wanted help. Sabir could have just told him to go away, instead he believed him and agreed. His only defense was ‘I didn’t know what he was saying because his Arabic was so bad’, which, given that Soufan is from Lebanon and speaks it as his first language, doesn’t pass the smell test to me.

        Soufan was also a vocal critic of the US torture program, and maintained it was less than worthless, and that every time he got useful intelligence it was from simply talking to people. He didn’t help to torture them at Gitmo. That’s simply utterly untrue.

        Like

        • yalensis says:

          Thanks for the clarifications, Ben.

          Here is the paragraph in question from my source piece:

          Написал пару книжек про «войну с террором» и свою колоссальную роль в ней, содержание которых сводится к тому, что если бы у него были власть и полномочия, 11 сентября бы не случилось. Подкреплял он этот тезис как раз тем, как самоотверженно помогал бороться с террором в пыточной тюрьме Гуантанамо и на воле. Видел я эти книги, поэтому и вспомнил.

          Here is a more literal translation than what I had in my review, in which I admittedly do imply that Soufan personally participated in the tortures:

          He wrote a couple of books about “the war against terror” and his own colossal role in it, the content of which leads to the conclusion that, if he had been in power and had authority, then September 11 would have never happened. He fortified this thesis with the claim that he selflessly helped to fight against terror while in the torture prison of Guantanamo and also in freedom [i.e., in other places that were not prisons]. I saw these books, that’s why I remembered [his name].

          Like

        • yalensis says:

          P.S. – my thoughts:

          Soufan sounds like the typical “has-been” pundit, who leveraged his language, ethnicity, and experience with the FBI, to later earn a living as an “anti-terror” analyst and expert. Maybe he honestly believes that he is fighting against jihadism and Wahhabi terrorism, and closes his eyes to the obvious facts that all of this “Arab” terrorism is organized by the CIA.

          He was probably not doing much recently, and now Crocus happened, so he is back in business, trying to sell his wares as the anti-jihadist expert. Dubious that he can offer much insight, since he always ignores the 600-pound elephant in the room.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Bukko Boomeranger says:

      Thanks for being on top of this and bringing up an angle from the Russian media that I have not seen mentioned elsewhere, not even on the streams from hyperactive Twaaterers such as Simplicius and Bebo. Kuznetsov has a great memory! And how great is the Internet — that we can find out about such things instantly while sitting in our living rooms? (Me, not so much, because I haveta get off the couch and go to a wifi hotspot, but that’s my own damn fault for being so cheap.) I had never heard of Soufan, and I’ve been a serious nousfan (sic) for decades. Any time I can get hipped to something new, I am appreciative. As the X-files said, “The Truth Is Out There” — we just have to find all the puzzle pieces of it and fit them together to complete the picture.

      Only, MY “truth picture” won’t be the same as yours. Or Ben’s! I’m not saying I dispute his interpretation of Soufan’s career. Ben seems to know more about it than you, definitely more than me, and apparently more than Kuznetsov. So what’s the proper spin on Soufan? There’s another rabbit hole that could be dived into, except I don’t have the time to take away from trying to drink from the rest of the information firehose. And speaking of mysterious FBI stories, I’m still wondering about Coleen Rowley and Zacarias Moussaoui. (Bonus points if you remember what that refers to. I can still reel off their names without going to a search engine, including the spelling of Zac’s name. There’s just SO much to keep in our mental files! If I insert a Soufan is that going to knock out an Ahmed Chalabi? How much can any man’s head hold?)

      Getting to a larger point, because I always like to do that, this post illustrates how all of humanity lives in a world of conspiracy thought now. Is Soufan a good guy, or was he part of an FBI entrapment plot? Going back to the 9/11-related comments your prior day’s post, there’s a constellation of people out there who view that event through various conspiratorial lenses. (Just to put it out there, while I’m not foily enough to think the Twin Towers were “controlled demolitions,” I DO think that Flight 93 was shot down by U.S. air defences and not crashed when passengers fought the hijackers. May we live long enough to see the truth come out!)

      Ever since the JFK assassination, the idea that “THEY are lying to us!” has taken over the world’s mentality. Not all at once — the disbelief syndrome took decades to get strong enough to become all-pervasive. But now it’s everywhere. (For Westies, at least, it took off with the JFK thing. In lots of other countries, there’s long been a culture of cynicism. I usedta work with a male nurse who had a Yugoslavian family background and he told me about the conspiracy theories people there had regarding Tito. With your Russian heritage, you’d have a feel for that sort of CT cultural tradition.)

      We all live with a degree of “1984’s” double-think. “The Official Narrative about THIS thing is fake, but I still believe that it’s milk in the container that I buy at the grocery store, not flavoured chalk dust.” My question (which is rhetorical, because there’s no way to answer it) is “How long can a complex society continue to function when everybody thinks everything is full of lies?” We’ve got to have a certain amount of trust to keep The Machine operating.

      When cynicism becomes all-encompassing, it creates its own momentum. Everyone feels like they might as well cheat, because that’s how life is. If we were all living in farming villages, maybe we could get around that attitude by being on our guard. It’s easier to “look sharp!” in simple circumstances. But now our world depends on a billion moving pieces, like the vast technoecosystem that enables me to write this, and you to read it. When it’s all grift, all the time — or even 25% grift in everything — things are NOT going to work. Breakdown, dead ahead!

      Ah well, Yalensis, I tend to drift into a delirium of doomcasting. This comment started off one way but drifted onto its own tangent. All inspired by your post on Soufan. And I’m not even stoned when I’m writing this. Although a lifetime that frequently features visiting altered states of consciousness has given me a perma-twisted outlook on life. Which is not necessarily wrong!

      PS — your Day #760 post on Paid Perps got a shout-out in the comments section of Naked Capitalism’s daily “Links” post on March 25. From one of their regular commenters nymmed “Polar Socialist”. I think he’s from Norway, and had mentioned you before. He was impressed by your explanation of the Tajik factor. Unfortunately, he forgot the letter “h” in his sly link, so it came out “Avalance”…

      Like

      • yalensis says:

        Hey, Bukko. I remember once reading (I don’t remember where) a very pithy comment which I have frequently repeated, to the effect that “The major cause of poverty is a lack of money…”

        Analogously, I believe the major cause of conspiracy theories is the abundance of conspiracies! I mean, shady people really do plot behind closed doors to commit various crimes and snooker people so they can get away with it. Hence, Americans (and others) are not wrong to be suspicious of everyone in power, or to assume that the rulers are always plotting something nefarious. Because half the time they are right.

        Of course, it does get hard to distinguish between “honest accidents” vs elaborate conspiracies. For example, it looks to me like the Harbor Boat catastrophe actually was an “honest accident”, but what do I know? and I am sure there will be a thousand conspiracy theories spawned, along with technical/forensic details and lots of clues about who the perps must have been, and why they did it….

        I don’t believe in fairies (sorry, Tinker Bell!), but I DO believe in conspiracies. Having said that, I have no patience for the down-and-dirty where people get really technical and try to prove, from some grainy photograph, that the force of impact came from below, and not from above, or something like that. This is Bellingcat-type amateur forensics, and you can find people who contradict each other on every little point!

        Whenever something happens that has the ear-marks of a conspiracy, I personally tend to ignore the “how dunnit” and just focus on the “who dunnit”. Mostly I just blame the CIA for everything that goes wrong, because I’ll be right about 80% of the time.

        P.S. – Russians are just as much conspiracy nuts as Yugoslavs or any other people. I believe I once recounted how I accidentally ran into an “underground cell” of conspiracy folks during a trip to Uglich, Russia. These people honored the memory of the Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich (the youngest son of Ivan the Terrible), and continued to believe that he had been assassinated by pro-Western elements in the Russian court. These same people also believed that Peter the Great was an imposter, and that Joseph Stalin “was a good man surrounded by bad men”. All of which bullet points have some plausibility. Well, except for the Peter the Great thing, that’s simply ridiculous. They claim that the real Peter was quite short in stature, then he did his European tour, and when he returned to Russia he was 2 meters tall.

        Like

  7. australianlady9 says:

    The investigations proceed at a pace and much is forthcoming:

    https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/03/26/the-nuland-budanov-tajik-crocus-connection/

    Liked by 1 person

    • Beluga says:

      Excellent link, thanks! Pretty much unravels it all completely. In detail.

      And yes, as per my original comment, it was Budanov’s GUR building in Kiev that was hit by a Zircon earlier today. Haven’r heard if he was in it at the time. I’m waiting to hear about a runaway concrete-mix truck hitting Nuland’s limo, and other similar delights in the coming days. After each incident, Putin can get on TV, and just like some American government gorph from State, say: “Ukraine didn’t do it !”

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment