Ukraine War Day #781: Tajik Shame – Part IV

Dear Readers:

Today continuing (and concluding) this rather long but interesting piece, wherein Russian reporter Grigory Kubatian seeks out the backstory of the four main Crocus terrorists. The guys who (allegedly) did the actual shooting (and stabbing). Hopefully, in the process, we have learned something about the small nation of Tajikistan and its fascinating people.

We left off with a rather horrific story about an ordinary Tajik man (presumably not affiliated with the terrorists, although he knew the barber, Faizov when they were both guest workers in Ivanovo, Russia) who had been beaten up rather badly by a gang of thugs. This happened in Russia on the very night of the terrorist attack, although he says it happened to him before the terrorist act, so was also, presumably, not related to that. He didn’t say if the thugs were ethnic Russians or fellow Tajiks. The thugs broke his jaw and left him in a dumpster. This reminds us that violence is a constant component of the lives of guest workers. As in any country, rootless men living in cramped ethnic ghettos without their wives, often create the substratum for a criminal milieu. Also the potential to be recruited by bad actors and various international evil-doers. Well, this is something that the police have to deal with.

Dalerjon Mirzoev: Apparently beat himself up while in police custody.

And speaking of wives, one does also read in the Russian press, they are trying to crack down on “fictitious marriages” between ethnic Russian women and Central Asian guest workers. The point being, of course, to obtain a Russian visa or passport. This is a tough one though, because sometimes it hard to tell what is a fictitious marriage and what is true love. Again, that is for the migration services to figure out.

The Wrong Dalerjon

But returning to Kubatian: His next task is to find the home of the terrorist Dalerjon Mirzoev, who also lives in Rudaki. Initially, in the first few hours after the terrorist attack, the police had Mirzoev pegged as the leader of the band of four. He had the repulsive task of running around looking for wounded people in the concert hall, those who had somehow survived the shooting, and then finishing them off with his knife.

Unfortunately for Kubatian, there are a lot of Dalerjons in this town, and most of them are completely innocent. And also startled to have someone knocking at their door asking them about the attack. Finally he learns the address of the correct Dalerjon, it’s a little hamlet (“kishlak”) called Galakhona.

Kubatian: My taxi driver Hamid, as we roll through several kishlaks, is not your usual conversationalist. If I had met him in Russia, I would have pegged him as a regular viewer of internet channels run by the Ukrainian security services, his head filled with the most outlandish conspiracy theories. “How could it be them!?” he exclaims. “Look for yourself. The sneakers they are wearing [in videos of the attack]. Men wearing matching blue tee-shirts and jeans shouting Shut the doors! Haven’t you seen that? O, Allah! There is no justice in this world!”

The actual facts are too stark, and the Tajiks find it hard to accept them.

Four Skinny Guys

We enter the village of Galakhona. And we soon find the house we are looking for. This is the home of Dalerjon Mirzoev’s parents. His father is not at home. He is a “tangem” driver, that’s a tiny Chinese microbus which follows a set route. Dalerjon himself also used to have a job driving one.

Dalerjon’s mother opens the door. Her name is Gulrakat Kurbanovna Mirzoeva. She is literally trembling from grief, emitting sigh after sigh. But she agrees to speak with me, although she doesn’t know any Russian. We use taxi driver Hamid to translate for us.

Dalerjon’s two younger brothers are right here, in the courtyard of the house. Dalerjon also had an older brother named Ravshatjon. Who left the country to fight for ISIL in Syria, and that’s where he perished. The mother won’t say a word about him. But about Dalerjon she says: “He has a weak character. I would even call him a coward. But he was good around the house. He was afraid of blood. He never served in the army.”

Dalerjon’s mom, Gulrakat Mirzoeva

“Is he religious?” I ask.

She waves her hand dismissively. “What are you talking about? He never even said his prayers. He might say his prayers one day out of ten.”

Gulrakat has already been hauled into the Prosecutor’s office for questioning, where she told them exactly the same thing. [yalensis: Hmm… Color me suspicious though. This powerful-looking woman raised at least 2 jihadi sons, one of them already a martyr.]

She says that Dalerjon did not have any close friends. He has 4 children, one boy and three girls. Thanks to this, he needed to work a lot of hours. Sometimes he worked as a taxi driver, he would drive to Dushanbe and back, earning roughly the equivalent of 1000-1500 rubles per day [yalensis: in American dollars, around $10 to $16.]

“That’s not a lot!” I exclaim.

“It was enough to live on,” Gulrakat demurs.

When they heard the news about the terrorist attack, Dalerjon’s wife suffered so much stress that, according to her mother-in-law, she practically twisted her own hands off. Just the day before [the attack] Dalerjon had called his mother from Novosibirsk [yalensis: I looked it up, it’s a 10-hour flight from Novosibirsk to Moscow!] where he was working as a taxi driver. He told her that his guest-worker registration expired on March 17, and that on the 25th he would return home. And then this happened.

Gulrakat also watches Ukrainian Telegram channels, and she believes in the same conspiracy theories as does Hamid. On the Ukrainian channels they blame Russia for everything and all but praise the terrorist killers. “The killers you see in the video are such sturdy, healthy fellows! But our guys are quite skinny,” she complains. Until the very last second she never lost hope that her son is actually innocent, that they caught the wrong guys.

Kubatian: Alas, this is a well known effect. A person carrying a weapon looks very dangerous when he is shooting at unarmed people. But then he becomes pitiful once he is captured and rendered harmless. I recall images of the detained prisoners. They didn’t look to be in the prime of health, but you couldn’t exactly call them skinny either.

The Poorest Home On The Block

A year ago Dalerjon Mirzoev left his parents’ home and went to live with his family in a separate house on a neighboring street. His younger brothers agree to show me that house.

If 32-year-old Dalerjon actually is a good man about the house [as his mother affirmed], then it doesn’t show on the external appearance of his home. It’s just a nondescript hut, more like a barn than a house. A wire fence covered with torn rags, twisted sticks instead of posts. This is the poorest hut (“khibara“) on the street. Dalerjon was catastrophically poor. And it appears that he was willing to do anything to improve his situation in life.

Dalerjon’s wretched home.

We return to Dushanbe. Taxi driver Hamid is still hopeful that Dalerjon is innocent. He shows me, on his phone, clips made by Ukrainian commentators, busy explaining how, once again, “the Russians shot themselves.” These types of clips are everywhere on Smartphones in Tajikistan. I patiently explain to Hamid, checking off on my fingers, exactly how and where these Ukrainian pundits are lying.

His face changes. “If what you are saying is true, then these terrorists need to be chopped up into pieces. Even if they are Tajiks!” he shouts.

I don’t approve of chopping people up, that goes without saying. But for these terrorist acts, the guilty will have to answer.

Epilogue

After I returned from Tajikistan, I spent a lot of time thinking: Why do so many people there not want to believe that their fellow citizens are guilty? Given that, generally speaking, they relate to Russia and to Russians very well, in a friendly manner. And the Tajiks do not consider themselves to be an aggressive people at all. This is why they are clutching at straws, tossed to them by the Ukrainian internet-channels. Which blame Russia always and for everything.

Although… Once you start digging a bit, then you find that these “good”, “home-keeping”, “jolly” fellow citizens, who suddenly out of the blue became terrorists, well it turns out that they had prior criminal convictions or some ties with extremists (either directly or via their brothers). And all were extremely in need of money. And it was for money, it seems, that they went off to kill.

But should one judge an entire people because of the crimes committed by these few?

After the Crocus terror act, we saw “hate posts” galore, with posters attempting to incite enmity between Russians and Tajiks. Or even against migrant workers in general. Those who inspired these attacks are rubbing their hands in glee. Ukraine’s Head of Disinformation swelled up with pride, like a toad, in his interview with the Times. [yalensis: Is he talking about Budanov? I’m not sure…] “Yes!” he boasted. “We are conducting an operation to sow ethnic discord in Russia. And after the terrorist act in Crocus, we doubled our efforts, because any kind of ethnic division in Russia, is useful for Ukraine.” And that is an exact quote.

And in Tajikistan the same thing is happening, a mirror image, in respect to ethnic Russians.

The last thing we should be doing is helping the Ukrainian secret services, along with the West, in performing their filthy, bloody work.

[THE END]

This entry was posted in Friendship of Peoples, Human Dignity, Military and War and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Ukraine War Day #781: Tajik Shame – Part IV

  1. MrDomingo says:

    I think Russia will have to try and revive Tajik economy directly rather than via guest workers being given insecure employment. This also goes for other central Asian countries otherwise Russian enemies will stir-up more trouble there. This applies to China as well as it is in the same boat, facing similar danger.

    Like

    • yalensis says:

      I think you’re right. Probably Russia and China don’t really want to take on this burden, and the voters may be against it too, but in the end they don’t really have a choice. Somebody needs to help these Central Asian countries, and I think it will have to be them.

      Maybe (just brainstorming here) they (Russia and China) could set up a special development fund for these countries. Maybe Iran could pitch in too given that the Tajiks are Persians (sort of).

      Like

      • Al says:

        China and Russia are working in tandem to boost the economy and development of central Asian countries. But it will take time.  Russia just managed to get back on its feet from the USSR disintegration and China only recently managed to curb terrorism in its border regions. 

        China held a 5+1 summit last year with the Central Asian countries and plans to make it a regular event. Things have been also slow due to prior lack of cooperation amongst Russia and China and not wanting to step on each other’s toes in Central Asia. But seems they have a more common vision now for the region and plans on implementing it. It will take time though.  

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Karl says:

    I’ve flown Moscow to Novosibirsk many times. It’s a four hour flight

    Liked by 1 person

    • yalensis says:

      Thanks for that first-hand info. When I first googled it, I did see that number of 4 hours. (That must be a direct flight.) It didn’t sound right to me (what do I know?), it sounded too quick for the distances involved, so I looked up specific flights, and they were more in the 8-10 hour range, but those must be milk-stops with layovers.

      I was just trying to do a reality check if it was actually plausible for the terrorist to be in Novosibirsk the day before the terror attack, and then in Moscow the very next day. Apparently it is! Even on a 10-hour flight, but all the more so if he took the 4-hour flight.

      Thanks again.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. australianlady9 says:

    Mr Kubatian is a military correspondent so I think that it’s Kyrylo Budanov that he’s referring to as Ukrainian “minister of disinformation” and “toad”, and let’s face it, Budanov’s visage does look toadlike. There’s something about that glowering stare.

    The objective of this act of terrorism, the Ukrainian motive, is to sow discord between Tajiks and Russia.

    And from what Kubatian reports the propaganda has made some inway among the villagers that he encountered. But there are a lot of emotional variables- family, religion, village status, Tajik ethnicity and Russian suzerainty. Masculinity also.

    But Kubatian says: 

    “A person carrying a weapon looks very dangerous when he is shooting at unarmed people. But then he looks pitiful once he is captured and rendered harmless. Alas, this is a well known effect”.

    So Dalerjon Mirzoev had the task of dispatching the wounded with his knife. This is just too horrible to contemplate. But with great distaste I wonder, were these wretched losers promised bonuses for every dead Russian whose death they videocammed? Everything about this terrorist act suggests incentivisation as the propellant and not religious extremism. And that leads back to Ukraine.

    Ukraine is not Muslim (despite the Ukrainian minister of defence belonging to that faith). Tajikistan is mostly (Hanafi) Sunni.

    Most poor Sunni men struggle through life without committing heinous acts. But there is a vulnerability with each factor of Sunni and poor and male. Russia needs to think this one through to curtail extremist temptations.

    This has been a most interesting investigation and report. Thanks yalensis and Grigory Kubatian.

    Like

    • yalensis says:

      You’re welcome. I hope people got something out of it. I learned a lot from reading and reviewing this report.

      As for the “goal” of the terror attack, I think that sowing discord between Tajikistan and Russia was one of the goals, but not the only one. The crafters of this monstrous act (most likely MI-6) also delude themselves that they are still playing the “Great Game” against Russia. The main goal was probably the delusionary favorite, making the Russian people feel unsafe so they overthrow Putin. Well, that’s the American way of thinking, but the English are probably stupid enough too, nowadays. But English also like to look at a map, and fantasize about restoring their Empire, as American proxies. They probably look at the map and see that they want to acquire some influence over Tajikistan, that way they can be a thorn in the side both to Russia and China. They might even believe that they can get Tajikistan into NATO eventually, along with Armenia. Who knows what kind of illogical thinking drives these murderous cretins?

      Like

  4. Bukko Boomeranger says:

    “My taxi driver Hamid, as we roll through several kishlaks, is not your usual conversationalist. If I had met him in Russia, I would have pegged him as a regular viewer of internet channels run by the Ukrainian security services, his head filled with the most outlandish conspiracy theories.

    We are all conspiracy theorists now! Actually, back in the days when I used to take taxis (Because my Xwife wanted to travel like that — I’m too cheap to do it on my own) taxi drivers were often great to have conspirversations with. So many had come from somewhere else (no matter what country we were in) so they were full of worldly perspectives. And sick of the official BS! They’d pick up on our American accent and we’d be off to the races. The “conspi-races”… Talking to cabbies was fun, and we were always keen on proving that we weren’t like “those” types of Amerikans. I wonder if it’s the same with Uber drivers? I have never had anything to do with that serf-driver service, so I’ll never know.

    Like

    • yalensis says:

      I have used Ubers from time to time (especially when my car was in the shop). Where I live, the taxi service is spotty, and you could stand on the corner waiting for hours. Uber however, was a brilliant entrepreneurial concept, I have to admit that even though I am generally anti-tech. You can see right on your phone a little moving map of the driver as he approaches you, with a running tally of how far away he is and how many minutes. I have always had luck, the waiting time is just minutes, as these Uber drivers seem to be swarming everywhere. And you don’t need to have any transactions with the drivers if you don’t want to, not even handing over money, it’s all pre-paid on your phone, and you can add a tip on your phone without having to interact with the driver. (I like that bit. I support the working class so I am a heavy tipper, but I always find the transaction itself embarrassing, and prefer to do it semi-anonymously.)

      Anyhow, the Uber drivers that I have had, come in two varieties, about evenly spaced, according to my personal statistics: There are the talkative ones, who are more like taxi drivers. And there are the completely silent ones, who just sit and listen to their music, not a peep, and it’s like being driven by a robot. Being anti-social, those are the ones that I personally prefer!

      Like

      • Bukko Boomeranger says:

        “Being anti-social, those are the ones that I personally prefer!”

        Don’t slag yourself by saying you’re “ANTI”social. This is a minor quibble, but a better word would be “A”social. As in, you’re not a butterfly with strangers. In the psych trade, “antisocials” are the mean bastards who do destructive things because they’re bent but not because their brains are broken by something such as schizophrenia. Mental health staff don’t use the word “sociopath” unfortunately. It’s considered derogatory, value-laden and unscientific. They acknowledge that people with those characteristics exist, obviously, because psychiatrists are not blind to reality. They use the term “antisocial personality disorder” for them. “Asocials” would be the loner types who are “comfortable in their own skin” as I like to say. I’m one of those, even though I can “talk the hind legs off a donkey” as the Irish saying goes. But I don’t NEED to be interacting with people all the time. Which is fine by me, because most people are jerks if you get too far beneath their shiny surface layer.

        Like

        • yalensis says:

          Good correction. No, I am not anti-social at all, in that respect. I don’t want to claim that I am a saint, but I really do try to be nice to people whenever I can, like say something nice to somebody, even a stranger and make them smile. I definitely do not want to bring more pain into this world, I leave that to others.

          Maybe I should call myself an introvert. At one job I had we had to take a personality test, and I came off as an introvert. Being around people tends to suck the energy out of me, although I do enjoy the occasional chat, even with a stranger.

          Like

  5. hismastersvoice says:

    Tadjikistan looks a lot like the Eastern Cape, complete with roaming thugs, massive inequality and poverty, people fleeing to richer parts of the world, and old people muttering about how they don’t understand what things are coming to these days.

    But at least here in the Eastern Cape there are social grants. Looks like in Tadjikistan people are on their own. My wife just came back from Nepal, by the way, and was horrified at how the lives of the average Nepalese are lived, without access to education or healthcare or any other social security.

    We live in a bubble of privilege without realising the horror outside the bubble, except when a war brings it home to us.

    Like

Leave a comment